Friday 19 January 2018

Thoughts on Acting and Production


Mulling over an upcoming stage production of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice.  Who to cast in the role of Shylock is always a tough call.  Getting an actor who cannot balance the comedic aspects with the grim tragic overtones of the role would diminish the role,  one of the more complex characters Shakespeare has created,  particularly for a modern audience. Unintended it may have been, but the Bard’s play probably poses more questions and challenges for modern audiences than those of his time. I can think of no better question to summarise the play than that asked in Act Four Scene One by Portia in one of her more politically correct and lucid (read as not blinded by love) moments, “Which is the merchant here, and which the Jew?”



Being me,  thinking of the role triggered other thoughts on acting and interpretations. In a way, part of the attraction of acting and indeed, part of the dynamics of acting,  lies in the element of conviction.  This element is a part of good salesmanship and being a good liar; to convince your target,  it is often necessary to convince oneself.  As much as that smacks of drinking the Kool-aid,  it is necessary to project the confidence.  A Korean actor, Gong Yoo,  said in an interview in 2017 https://youtu.be/ungTrlhrJa8 that part of the liberating attractions of acting lay in the ability to lose oneself in the character.  That is the double-edged sword of the art of acting. That is the reason why some actors go into a deep funk during and after a certain role; losing oneself in a role is both liberating and stifling.  That said,  each actor injects a part of him or herself into the character they play, that is why the same lines emerging from the mouths of different actors have different impact (or effects) and constitute different interpretations.


Acting in that sense is a dialectic;  a tug-of-war between how much of one's self to lose and how much to assert.  That is also why relationships are easily formed (and sometimes lost easily) in the entertainment industry.  Apart from the proximity factor (being thrown together constantly and intensively in a relatively short period of time),  there is the character immersion imperative.  Of course,  no one is denying the existence of physical attraction or real emotion, after all,  most actors tend to be more physically attractive than the general population. LOL stating the obvious is a necessity at times.


Lol the myriad of thoughts from one role….

Sunday 14 January 2018

Rhapsodies on Windy Nights 4

The latest installment in my music and poetry series.

Have a listen to my singing and lines from T.S. Eliot's The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock on Soundcloud.

https://soundcloud.com/judith-loewe/rhapsodies-on-windy-nights-4 

And to soothe the ears here's the link for the excellent instrumental I found online https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ahjggbS-W1g

And for those who couldn't figure out which song I made unrecognisable (for shame, really that bad huh??)


Monday 1 January 2018

Review of Korean Drama Goblin


The following is a short review of the Korean drama Goblin.  For more detailed reviews and recaps,  do visit sites like Dramabeans http://www.dramabeans.com/tag/the-lonely-shining-goblin/.

While this review tries to be as objective as possible,  subjectivity is restricted as this reviewer has watched the entire series at least three times,  LOL holiday binge watching redefined.


What struck a favourable chord

Goofy humour that ranges from goblin vs  grim reaper rivalry to pop culture jokes and implicit references to lead characters’ other works.


The quirky characters depicted in this series seem to prove my theory that the best Kdrama protagonists are at the very least quirky, at best (and in the most polite descriptive terms LOL) neurotic man-child entities. The level of juvenile humour and behaviour may jar at times with the serious themes or tries to explore but I guess the distance provided by drama really helps impart humour to situations that would otherwise be aggravating.

Tear-wringing cliches such as when the female protagonist dies and the Grim Reaper mourns her with a reflection that asserts the existence of a cruel capricious God,  akin to the God of the Old Testament: “To the cruel question thrown out by God,  she gave a sad answer.”


Jarring notes

The theological/mystical elements



The gods shown in the drama are alternately capricious, generous and cruel. While immortal, omniscient and omnipotent, the gods in this series are oddly human. The depictions of afterlife seem to faintly echo Dante's Divine Comedy in its structure of Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. Personally, I found the other dimension of nothingness to which the Goblin is banished closest to the wasteland which is devoid of God.


There is a tiny bit of logic malfunction when it comes to concepts of time.  For God and immortal beings,  would time matter?  Time matters only when it is finite and when the subject is mortal/human. To be immortal is to be outside of time, making time meaningless.  But hey,  I have no problems shutting down logic in the face of pure entertainment and fun LOL 😄

The glut of product placement slots

Be warned,  directly or indirectly,  there's product placement almost every 10 minutes. And I'm not talking about references to the actors’ other works such as Train to Busan, nope,  it is like they decided to run commercials without the commercial break.  Beer,  sandwiches,  cameras,  the list is endless. Subtlety is not an art this series explores. Hence,  prepare to be exasperated halfway through.

The age gap question

Frankly, I'm not too bothered by the age gap issue, the crux of the problem lies in the way multiple roles are blurred. I've seen seedier real life versions of such pairings and the reel version doesn't come close to freaky. What is discomfiting is the fact that the male lead seems to act as both lover and father figure, comforting the female lead like a child even after their amorous roles are confirmed. Age play between consenting adults is a matter of personal preferences, but the ambiguity here is what creates discordance.


Overall

While uneven in certain areas of its narrative, the series is redeemed by the “aesthetic” aspects;  plainly put,  audiences are likely to be too busy noting the beautiful presentations to note the flaws.
Of course, this has much to do with gorgeous photography as well as the leads who are easy on the eye. Yet,  the cast is not the most apparent eye candy selection. There are plenty of "prettier" and more "gorgeous" Korean actors and actresses in the highly competitive world of Korean entertainment. It is the ability to be versatile and largely natural that helps this cast rise up the ranks.



Conclusion

Watch and enjoy!

Will you be a Kdrama fan?

LOLZ


Sunday 31 December 2017

TS Eliot and pop culture

There may seem to be little common ground between a “serious” (and some say seriously depressing)  poet like TS Eliot and pop culture. Yet,  the sentiments expressed in Eliot’s poetry; the angst,  the despair and a sense of loss is what haunts modern life and modern pop culture. 




That sentiments embedded in Gerontion and Portrait of a Lady should find a counterpart in Sam Kim’s Who are You is unsurprising, particularly considering the underlying emotions of the TV series Goblin which features the song.

Have a listen https://soundcloud.com/judith-loewe/rhapsodies-on-windy-nights-installment-1


The theme of seasons and the degradation of religious significance, present in the memorable opening lines of Journey of the Magi, is nicely complemented by the secular consumerist modernity of Let it snow.And you can have another taste of my singing here: https://soundcloud.com/judith-loewe/rhapsodies-2  LOL



Lines from Rhapsody on a Windy Night exploring a surreal, nighttime, urban landscape and Cai Qin’s 被遗忘的时光 may present a strange contrast initially. However, the stirring of memories amid modern degradation is a strand that runs through both.


Here's the link https://soundcloud.com/judith-loewe/rhapsodies-on-windy-nights-3 



Readers: Let me know what you think.Happy New Year everyone!

x

Sunday 29 October 2017

Dilemma

Not sure if I should celebrate or cry: 80% set to quit my job and go back to school.

On the one hand, there should be more time for social media and writing.



On the other hand, it's bills, bills and more bills...

Maybe I'll get a treat instead of a trick if I asked. Hope springs eternal yeah?


Happy Halloween everyone!

Sunday 15 October 2017

Something's Afoot

I'm not particularly fond of conspiracy theories but I'm not believer in coincidences, so what are the chances of an older story getting 50 votes a day for the last couple of days? Go figure. The most boring and logical explanation is the decision by some reader(s) to systematically screw up the voting system on my stories if not others.



http://ow.ly/giPR30fSD17 Judge for yourself.
And while you're there, have a read!




But only if you're up to the challenge LOL


Sunday 24 September 2017

Story Idea Innocent

Though there wasn't enthusiastic response to an earlier call for ideas and feedback, I'm pushing on with putting up ideas and hoping readers and friends will actually respond. Soon.



<drumming fingers> Hey, is there anyone out there?? Bored...

Here's the idea this week.  How's about an LW story where a female attorney is shown making opening statements / summing up why her client is innocent despite his own estranged wife's accusation that he was the one who killed her lover? The estranged wife watches from the gallery and glares at both the prosecutor and her estranged husband who is the defendant.  As the attorney sits down, she recalls...

Flashback

The husband is facing his new attorney, a little surprised that it is his sister-in-law.  She asks him point blank if he's guilty.  He is silent and just when she pleads with him to talk to her if he wishes to mount a defence. Because things are not looking good for him and his last defence attorney had given up.

Just as she is about to give up and end the session, he surprises her by speaking up. He says quietly that his only guilt is in believing foolishly that those wedding vows were forever.

He reveals that he first suspected his wife,  her sister,  was having an affair when the neighbour hinted that a man was coming round rather often in the afternoons.  He had confronted his wife and that was when she'd offered to quietly divorce him if he'd give her a half share of the house and their investments.  She humiliates him by reminding him that she'd helped bail him out when his business went bankrupt during the financial crisis.  Her attitude clearly shows she no longer has any respect  for him.  He pleads with her to give their marriage another chance. For their child if not for their love.  She scoffs at him and says there's no love when he's  struggling to keep the job he'd found only after two years of being unemployed after he went out of business.  The attorney notices how he clenches his fist.  He says he refused to give her a divorce and she threw a tantrum.  He's shocked because it seems she's almost another person, not the woman he thought he knew. He decided to start monitoring the house to safeguard Ruth (the child)  and himself.

He's increasingly alarmed by what the monitoring shows.  She's bringing her lover around when their child is home from school and more than once the child is calling for her mother even as she impatiently tells the daughter to wait as she is busy with uncle Hank. When Ruth appears in the doorway,  Hank seems to laugh at her and say she'd better start calling him daddy, she refuses and runs away crying. David said he decided to agree to the divorce on condition that he gets custody, after seeing that.

When his attorney asks if there's more, he looks away and says no. She is suspicious and asks for the tapes from his friend.  She finds several disturbing videos. One particular video is damning,  it shows his wife and her lover plotting to accuse him of violence and therefore force his hand in terms of the settlement.  They are shown laughing.

The attorney is shown to gritting her teeth at how terrible her sister is.  His friend asks if she's going to help him.  After she says yes,  he brings out a video that he says is crucial evidence.  It is a video of the day of the attack.  She watches it and stares in shock at the screen.

She asks him at next interview why he didn't reveal there was crucial evidence. He says, obviously anguished,  that for all her vicious behaviour, Letty is still the mother of his child.

Last day of trial,  after a call by the defence to have a closed discussion with the judge and prosecution. When the prosecutor and defence exit the judge's chamber,  they look grim.  The wife is glaring at her husband while he is staring into space.  Judge asks if, due to new evidence,  the prosecutor has some announcement.  The prosecutor announces that due to the emergence of crucial evidence, they have decided to drop charges against the husband. The wife is shown to be outraged and protesting loudly.  The prosecutor also announces that charges will instead be filed against Letty Fogarty. She is shown being placed under arrest despite her protests.

The husband is crying as he is set free and goes home to see his child.

Epilogue
A year later.

The attorney visits ex-brother-in-law at his new house.  It's smaller but cozy.  After he puts Ruth to bed.  He thanks her again for all the help she has given him.  She asks why he's bringing it up again,  he's thanked her many times over the year.  He says softly that he's aware of the risk she took with her career and conscience.  She asks what he means.  He says that after the case and just before he moved out of old house, his neighbour had a drink with him and talked about how the attorney he had kept asking him questions and that she'd asked an odd question on her last visit: when had he first alerted David to his wife's infidelity?  His neighbour told him that he'd been so exasperated that he'd said the stubborn, honest fool next door had so much faith in his wife that he'd ignored his neighbour's hints for almost half a year before he'd finally seemed to wake up and confront his wife.  And that was when he'd asked his friend to show him the tape of the bedroom the day of the attack.  He asks the attorney why she'd risked so much to help him when she'd obviously realised the truth.

She replies, before she explained her motives for helping him,, she wants to know when he knew and what actually happened.

He smiles bitterly.  He said he'd been alarmed when his neighbour first hinted at Letty's unusual behaviour.  When he found out the truth,  he was devastated.  He decided against confronting her till his position improved.  He installed bugging equipment and knew where the cameras were.  Six months later,  he spotted an opportunity when his wife and her lover decided to set him up.  He says on the day of the attack,  he'd taken Letty's call and decided to let them think they'd succeeded in ambushing him.  As agreed,  he'd watched  as Hank punched and kicked Letty as they'd planned. That Letty had fallen unconscious was a plus.  He walked in and started pleading for mercy from a blind corner. He laughed as he recalled Hank's confusion.  As Hank approached him, he brought out a stun gun and stuns him. Unexpectedly,Hank fell and hit his head on the corner of the foot of the bed. David is momentarily stunned by what has happened but recovers and calls the police.

She says she realised something wasn't right when the neighbour said he'd hinted at Letty's affair earlier than David had claimed.  When she looked more closely at the crucial evidence,  she'd seen a certain flash in a corner of the mirror, it was a part of a tattoo that was familiar to her. She'd recognised part of the tattoo as she'd suggested the design when he'd proposed to her sister and asked what would symbolise his vows to her sister as Letty was demanding proof that he'd be faithful forever. At that moment she'd asked herself why if he'd been defending himself as the soundtrack of the video suggested,  his arm was raised and therefore reflected in the mirror.  She says she believes his claim that Hank's death was an accident and hopes David can start life anew now that he is free of the nightmarish marriage.

She wishes him well and leaves. She recalls the design she'd suggested to David as strains of a song plays.

BTW tentative title is Innocent.
----
So what do you think? Let me know.  I'll be waiting for feedback.